Newton county water uthority . org12/17/2023 ![]() We must first pass upon the two points urging the invalidity of the water supply district. ![]() The fifth point urges that certain issues as found by the jury having to do with the assessment of personal property were answered by the jury unfavorably to it and in such way as to be against the great weight and overwhelming preponderance of the evidence. The fourth point urges that the taxes levied against appellant's property were invalid for the reason that substantial amounts of personal property in the district were omitted from the tax rolls for the years involved, and that same resulted from the failure of appellee's tax officials to make a bona fide effort to put such property on the tax rolls. The third point urges that there were no valid levies of *726 taxes for the years involved. This appeal has resulted from the judgment rendered.Īppellant bases its appeal upon five points, the first two of which assert that the Act of the Legislature creating the Newton County Water Supply District, being Chapter 359, 54th Legislature, 1955, p. ![]() The cause was tried before the court and a jury, and upon verdict judgment was rendered for appellee for the sum of $11,978.05, plus 10 percent attorneys fees provided by Article 7880-73, Vernon's Tex.Ann. The suit was instituted in the district court of Newton County by appellee Newton County Water Supply District to collect taxes, penalties and interest for the years 19 allegedly owed by appellant Southern Pine Lumber Company to appellee on certain lands in Newton County. Whitworth and Grady Trimble, Jr., Jasper, Ward R. 6264.Ĭourt of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. NEWTON COUNTY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT, Appellee. 325 S.W.2d 724(1959) SOUTHERN PINE LUMBER COMPANY et al., Appellants,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |